Other language versions: 繁體中文 ・ 日本語
The short version
- Soaking in hot water — what researchers call "passive heat therapy" — raises core body temperature, increases skin blood flow and speeds up the heart, and the moving blood presses more strongly along the inner walls of your vessels. A 2020 mechanism review by Cullen and colleagues in the Journal of Applied Physiology identified these as physiological responses that heat therapy partly shares with aerobic exercise.
- On whether heat therapy can improve blood pressure, studies do not all agree. In 2025, Price and colleagues pooled 51 studies in Experimental Physiology and found repeated heat therapy was associated with an average drop of about 5 mmHg in systolic blood pressure; the same year, Hamaya and colleagues in the American Journal of Preventive Cardiology analyzed only 20 randomized controlled trials and found no clear overall effect — yet whole-body heating, and people at higher cardiovascular risk, still showed clearer improvement. In plain terms: heat therapy may help, but the effect depends on how you heat, how often, and your baseline health.
- For people who temporarily or long-term cannot exercise easily, clinical studies offer early support. A 12-week trial by Akerman and colleagues in the American Journal of Physiology–Heart and Circulatory Physiology (2019) observed improved walking distance in patients with peripheral artery disease; a multicenter trial by Tei and colleagues in Circulation Journal (2016) saw improved heart-function class and walking distance in heart-failure patients.
- Heat therapy is an adjunct. It cannot provide the muscle contraction, energy expenditure and most training adaptations that exercise delivers. The 2020 review by Cullen and colleagues still lists exercise as the first choice for maintaining and improving health.
- Older adults and people with chronic conditions must review and follow safety guidance before starting heat therapy. Official recommendations from Taiwan's Health Promotion Administration and Japan's Consumer Affairs Agency are summarized at the end of this article.
One table first: what has research seen for each type of heat therapy?
| Type of heat therapy | Most commonly observed results in research | Most appropriate current role |
|---|---|---|
| Whole-body bathing (approx. 38–41°C) | Small blood-pressure reductions, improved vessel-dilation response | An adjunct when exercise is hard |
| Post-exercise hot bath (approx. 40°C) | Blood pressure and vascular markers may improve further | An extra option for people already exercising |
| Medically supervised heat therapy | Improved walking ability and function class in some heart patients | Medical settings only — do not copy at home |
| Lower-body heating devices | Small trials show improved blood pressure and leg-vessel responses in older adults | Early evidence for passive heating at home |
| Foot baths and thermostatic foot spas | Self-reported sleep quality often improves; instrument-measured results remain unclear | A low-barrier, easy-to-do way to relax |
This table only shows direction. Water temperature, duration, frequency and heated body area differ widely across studies, and the sections below unpack each row.
Your heart speeds up in a hot bath — does that equal exercise?
| Hot bath vs. exercise | Hot bath | Aerobic exercise |
|---|---|---|
| Core temperature and heart rate | Both rise | Both rise |
| Blood-flow stimulus on vessel walls | Present | Present, and usually stronger |
| Muscle contraction | Almost none | Yes |
| Energy expenditure | Lower | About 10 times that of heat therapy |
| Can it replace the other? | No | Still the first choice for health |
Within minutes of getting into hot water you feel your skin warm and your heart beat faster, which is why "does a bath count as exercise" is such a common search. Mechanism research has a concrete answer.
The 2020 mechanism review by Cullen and colleagues in the Journal of Applied Physiology, "The health benefits of passive heating and aerobic exercise: To what extent do the mechanisms overlap?", mapped the overlaps and differences between passive heat therapy and aerobic exercise. Both raise core temperature and skin blood flow, so the moving blood presses harder along the inner lining of the vessels; researchers call this force "shear stress." Moderate blood-flow stimulation is thought to relate to the vessels' ability to regulate themselves. In small trials cited by the review, 8 weeks of heat therapy improved brachial-artery dilation function by 1.7%, and some studies observed cardiorespiratory fitness gains of roughly 2–3 ml of oxygen per kilogram per minute after 6–8 weeks of heat therapy.
The differences are just as clear: during exercise the heart pumps out 18–25 liters of blood per minute, versus about 10 liters during passive heating; for the same rise in body temperature, exercise burns about 10 times the energy of heat therapy. In an 8-week comparison cited in the review, the exercise group lost weight while the hot-water immersion group did not. The authors therefore position passive heat therapy as an adjunct option for people who find exercise difficult — not a replacement for exercise.
Single-session comparisons support the same distinction. In 2022, Hussain and colleagues published a randomized crossover trial in Complementary Therapies in Medicine, "Infrared sauna as exercise-mimetic?", in which 10 healthy women completed 45 minutes of infrared sauna, 45 minutes of indoor cycling and 45 minutes of rest: sauna raised tympanic temperature 1.05°C above rest and 0.79°C above exercise, but breathing rate stayed clearly lower than during exercise, and blood pressure, arterial stiffness and heart-rate variability did not differ significantly across the three conditions. The sample was tiny and exposure single-session, so this is only a narrow reference — but the direction is consistent: a faster heartbeat is a heat-dissipation response, not proof you have completed aerobic exercise.
To read heat-therapy research, check "how it heats" and "what was measured" first
| What to check first | What it includes | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Heating method | Whole-body bathing, lower-body heating, foot bath, sauna | Heated body area differs, so results can't be compared directly |
| Heat and time | Water temperature, session length, weekly frequency, total weeks | These drive core-temperature and physiological responses |
| Measured outcomes | Blood pressure, vessel dilation, cardiorespiratory fitness, blood sugar, blood lipids, inflammation, walking distance | Evidence strength differs a lot by outcome |
Two groups of variables decide how any heat-therapy study should be read.
The first is "heat dose": the heating method (whole-body bathing, lower-body heating, local foot bath, sauna), water or ambient temperature, heated body area, session length, weekly frequency and total weeks. The larger the heated area and the longer the session, the more core temperature rises; whole-body immersion delivers a higher heat dose than lower-body heating, which in turn exceeds an ankle-deep foot bath. This is why results from one study cannot simply be transferred to another.
The second is what the study measured: blood pressure, whether vessels dilate normally, cardiorespiratory fitness, blood sugar, blood lipids, inflammation, arterial stiffness, and everyday function such as how far you can walk in six minutes. As you'll see below, heat therapy shows more signal for blood pressure and vessel dilation — but for fitness, metabolism or inflammation, the results are much less consistent.
The positive signals: what Pizzey and Price found

| Study | Scope | Main findings |
|---|---|---|
| Pizzey et al. (2021) | 15 studies | Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and vessel-dilation function all improved |
| Price et al. (2025) | 51 papers | Repeated heat therapy associated with ~5 mmHg average drop in systolic pressure |
| Effects neither study confirmed | — | Anti-inflammatory effects and reduced arterial stiffness |
The plain-language conclusion first: repeated whole-body heat therapy may modestly lower blood pressure and may improve the vessels' ability to relax and dilate; clear anti-inflammatory or artery-softening effects have not been shown.
The 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis by Pizzey and colleagues in Experimental Physiology, "The effect of heat therapy on blood pressure and peripheral vascular function", included 15 studies of repeated heat therapy — 30–90 minutes per session, 10–36 sessions in total — across healthy and clinical populations. Pooled results: mean arterial pressure fell 5.86 mmHg, systolic pressure fell 3.94 mmHg, diastolic pressure fell 3.88 mmHg, and vessel-dilation function improved 1.95%; resting heart rate did not change. By the study's own evidence grading, the blood-pressure findings carry moderate confidence, while mean arterial pressure and vessel-dilation findings carry low confidence — the numbers point in a direction, but precision is limited.
The 2025 meta-analysis by Price and colleagues, also in Experimental Physiology, "Heat thermotherapy to improve cardiovascular function and cardiometabolic health", widened the net to 51 papers and analyzed single-session versus repeated heating separately. Repeated heating was associated with drops of 5 mmHg systolic, 3 mmHg diastolic and 4 mmHg mean arterial pressure; single sessions mainly showed increased blood flow and vascular responses. C-reactive protein, heat-shock proteins and arterial stiffness showed no clear change. Results varied widely between studies, meaning the real-world effect likely depends on heating method, frequency and population.
Why didn't Hamaya's analysis see across-the-board improvement?
| Price 2025 | Hamaya 2025 |
|---|---|
| Included 51 papers, broader study types | Included only 20 randomized controlled trials |
| Overall results more positive | Most outcomes showed no clear improvement |
| Repeated heat therapy linked to lower blood pressure | Whole-body heating, and higher-risk groups, still showed improvement |
In plain terms, the two papers are not "one says it works, the other says it doesn't." Hamaya applied stricter inclusion criteria, so the overall conclusion is more conservative; but when the analysis looked only at whole-body heating, or at people who already had cardiovascular risk, blood-pressure improvement was still visible.
Also in 2025, Hamaya and colleagues published in the American Journal of Preventive Cardiology the meta-analysis "Non-acute effects of passive heating interventions on cardiometabolic risk and vascular health", which included only 20 randomized controlled trials lasting 2–15 weeks, covering bathing, sauna, hot yoga and local heating. Pooled together, vessel-dilation capacity, arterial stiffness, resting heart rate, blood sugar, blood lipids and C-reactive protein showed no clear change; overall systolic pressure fell an average 2.46 mmHg, which did not reach clear statistical significance.
Its subgroup analyses, however, can be read alongside the positive findings above: whole-body heating produced a significant 4.11 mmHg drop in systolic pressure (95% CI −7.36 to −0.86), and people with coronary risk or cardiovascular disease showed a significant 2.52 mmHg drop. The authors themselves note these subgroup results come from small trials and are not yet conclusive.
So the most reasonable current reading is: benefit is more likely with whole-body heating, done repeatedly, in people whose cardiovascular risk is already elevated; for blood sugar, blood lipids, inflammation or fitness, current evidence is insufficient.
Heat therapy for people who can't exercise easily: who has early research?
| Studied group | Heat-therapy method | What the study saw | Key limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peripheral artery disease patients | ~39°C bathing + calisthenics | Walking distance improved, similar to supervised exercise | Only 22 people; effect can't be fully credited to bathing |
| Advanced heart-failure patients | Medically supervised dry sauna | Heart-function class and walking distance improved | A medical protocol — do not copy at home |
| Health-screened older adults | Lower-body circulating hot-water device | Daytime blood pressure and leg-vessel responses improved | Only 19 people; device differs from a regular foot bath |
This topic is intensely practical for one group: people who want to move but can't, or whose activity falls far short of guidelines. The World Health Organization's 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour recommend adults get at least 150 minutes of moderate activity per week, and its 2024 updated fact sheet reports that 31% of adults worldwide — about 1.8 billion people — fall short, with 20–30% higher mortality risk among the insufficiently active. For this group, several clinical studies have tested heat therapy directly.
Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) often cannot complete recommended exercise because walking hurts. The 12-week randomized controlled trial by Akerman and colleagues in the American Journal of Physiology–Heart and Circulatory Physiology (2019), "Heat therapy vs. supervised exercise therapy for peripheral arterial disease", assigned 22 patients with mild-to-moderate disease to heat therapy or supervised exercise. After 12 weeks, both groups improved six-minute total walking distance by an average of 41 meters and pain-free walking distance by 43 meters, with no clear difference between groups; the heat-therapy group's systolic pressure also fell 7 mmHg. However, each group had only 11 people, and the heat-therapy group performed calisthenics after immersion, so this remains an encouraging preliminary result — worth further research.
For heart failure there is a Japanese multicenter trial. The WAON-CHF randomized study by Tei and colleagues in Circulation Journal (2016) enrolled 149 hospitalized patients with advanced heart failure, who received 60°C far-infrared dry sauna for 15 minutes daily over 10 days. The treatment group improved in heart-function class, six-minute walking distance and cardiac imaging measures — although the main blood marker used to assess cardiac strain showed no clear change. This therapy is delivered under medical supervision and is not a routine anyone can reproduce at home.
For the broader picture in older and cardiovascular populations, the 2025 review by Rodrigues and colleagues in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, "Passive heat therapy for cardiovascular disease: current evidence and future directions", screened 2,913 records down to 18 studies with an average participant age of 67. The most consistent improvements clustered in cardiac function, vessel-dilation response and six-minute walking distance; resting heart rate and blood pressure were less consistent. The authors position heat therapy as a "promising adjunct" while cautioning that study designs and samples vary widely.
On home feasibility, the 2025 sham-controlled 8-week trial by Ruiz-Pick and colleagues in the Journal of Applied Physiology, "Home-based heat therapy lowers blood pressure and improves endothelial function in older adults", had 19 older adults (mean age 67) wear tube-lined trousers circulating hot water at home (target skin temperature ~40°C; control ~33°C) for 60 minutes, 4 days a week: the heated group's daytime systolic pressure fell an average of 5 mmHg and thigh-artery dilation function improved, with 100% completion in both groups. Note this was a purpose-built lower-body heating device, the participants were health-screened, and the sample was small — it demonstrates the feasibility and early effect of "home-based, passive, lower-body heating", not evidence for ordinary foot soaking.
Long-term habit studies also show positive associations. The Japan Public Health Center prospective study by Ukai and colleagues in Heart (2020) followed 30,076 adults for nearly two decades and found that near-daily bathers had statistically about 28% lower incidence of cardiovascular disease, about 35% lower coronary heart disease and about 26% lower stroke. The Finnish study by Laukkanen and colleagues in BMC Medicine (2018) followed 1,688 people for about 15 years and found lower cardiovascular mortality among those using a sauna 4–7 times a week. These are long-term observations, not experiments that assigned people to bathe, so they show association — they cannot prove that bathing or sauna caused the outcomes. A 2026 review by Tanaka in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health likewise notes that sauna has the deeper long-term data, while bathing research concentrates on blood-pressure and vascular measures.
The benefits of heat therapy after exercise
| A 40°C bath after exercise | Additional improvement | No additional improvement |
|---|---|---|
| Steward et al. 2025, 8-week trial | Mean arterial pressure, vessel-dilation function, self-rated physical health | Cardiorespiratory fitness, blood sugar, blood lipids, inflammation, arterial stiffness |
Another practical question: for people already exercising, does a hot bath afterward add anything? The 2025 8-week randomized parallel trial by Steward and colleagues in The Journal of Physiology, "Post-exercise hot water immersion enhances haemodynamic and vascular benefits of exercise…", gives the most direct answer so far. Twenty-four previously inactive middle-aged adults (mean age 58) completed 2–4 sessions of 30-minute moderate exercise per week, followed by 30 minutes in either 40°C or 34°C water: the 40°C group gained an extra 4 mmHg reduction in mean arterial pressure, an extra 2.33% improvement in vessel-dilation function, and better self-rated physical health; cardiorespiratory fitness, aortic stiffness, blood sugar, blood lipids and inflammatory markers did not improve further from adding the hot bath.
This result describes heat therapy's role precisely: added on top of exercise, it can further improve blood pressure and vascular measures; as a substitute for the fitness and metabolic gains of exercise, the evidence does not support it.
Foot baths and thermostatic foot spas: the lowest-barrier option for everyone
| What foot-bath research measures | Current results |
|---|---|
| Self-perceived sleep quality | Most studies lean positive |
| Instrument-measured sleep onset and total sleep time | No clear improvement so far |
| Advantage of thermostatic foot spas | Easy to hold a fixed temperature and time |
| Equal to whole-body heat therapy? | No — heated area and core-temperature change are both smaller |
For people without a bathtub, or for whom full-body immersion is impractical, the foot bath is the smallest heat dose and the lowest barrier. Its research is almost entirely about sleep, and subjective versus objective results point in different directions — they need to be read side by side.
On subjective improvement: the 2025 meta-analysis by Chang and colleagues in the Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences pooled 18 studies with 950 adults aged 60 and above and found pre-bed warm foot baths significantly improved self-rated sleep quality, with subgroups suggesting the effect was better at water temperatures not above 40°C, soaking at least 10 minutes, continued for at least a week — while the authors state plainly that large trials with objective measurement are still lacking. The 2024 meta-analysis by Jiang, Chen and Belcastro in the Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine found that pre-bed foot baths at 40°C, up to 20 minutes, about 10 cm deep improved older adults' self-rated sleep quality, while objective sleep-onset improvement appeared in the 41–42°C subgroup — the two papers' optimal temperatures do not match, and that is the honest current state of the literature.
On objective reservations: the 2025 meta-analysis by Shanmugam and colleagues in Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine could include only 6 trials of low methodological quality (176 people in total), and polysomnography-measured sleep-onset latency, total sleep time and sleep efficiency all failed to reach statistical significance. In other words, "feeling like you slept better" has consistent support; "changes an instrument can measure" does not yet.
The role of a thermostatic device is clearest in one trial. The 2025 randomized controlled trial by Durgun and Kaya in the Journal of Clinical Practice and Research had 60 institutionalized older adults soak their feet nightly for 6 weeks, one hour before bed, using a thermostatic foot spa (settable 35–48°C with auto power-off) held at 38–40°C for 20 minutes: the foot-bath group's Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index improved from 14.14 to 11.51 (within-group p=0.001), the control group showed no significant change, and the between-group difference was significant; the study was unblinded, ran in only two institutions, and all outcomes were self-rated. What this study demonstrates is the execution problem a thermostatic device solves — a basin of hot water cools noticeably within 20 minutes, and constant temperature, a timer and auto power-off make "a fixed temperature for a fixed time" easy and safer — not that a foot spa has physiological effects beyond warm water itself.
Placing the foot bath back in this article's framework: its heated area is small and core-temperature rise limited, so it cannot be treated as a miniature version of whole-body heat therapy; its real advantage is that almost anyone can do it.
Safety reminders (read this section if nothing else)

| Check before heat therapy | Official guidance highlights |
|---|---|
| Water temperature | Generally 41°C or below; 40°C or below for people with high blood pressure, blood sugar or lipids |
| Duration | Japan advises within 10 minutes; Taiwan advises no more than 15 minutes per session |
| Getting up | Move slowly; avoid standing up suddenly |
| Timing | Avoid bathing right after meals, after alcohol, or after sleep medication |
| Company | Older adults and people with chronic conditions should not bathe alone |
The physiological responses to hot water are real, which means the risks are real too — especially for older adults and people with chronic conditions. Official guidance from two authorities is summarized here, and this section concentrates the safety context for the whole article.
Japan's Consumer Affairs Agency, in its official 2019 advisory on bathing accidents among older adults, lists: warm the bathroom and changing room before bathing; use roughly 41°C or below and soak within about 10 minutes; rise slowly to avoid the sudden blood-pressure drop of standing quickly; do not bathe right after meals, after drinking alcohol, or after taking sleep medication; and tell family before you bathe. Taiwan's Health Promotion Administration (Ministry of Health and Welfare), in its "six essentials of healthy hot-spring bathing", advises: no more than 15 minutes per session; rise slowly; drink water before and after; people with diabetes, high blood pressure or high blood lipids should keep water at or below 40°C and avoid alternating hot and cold; wait at least 2 hours after meals; and people with chronic conditions should bathe with a companion, never alone. If you have cardiovascular disease, are pregnant, have broken or infected skin, or take medication that affects blood pressure or consciousness, discuss the method and dose with a medical professional first. This article is a research summary intended as health-education background, not medical advice; the study results described here belong to each study's specific conditions, and individual responses vary.
FAQ
Q1: My heart beats faster in a hot bath — does that mean I exercised?Both raise body temperature, skin blood flow and heart rate, but the 2020 mechanism review by Cullen and colleagues notes that heat therapy lacks exercise's muscle contraction, burns only about one-tenth the energy, and misses most training adaptations; in Hussain 2022's comparison, sauna also produced far lower breathing and cardiorespiratory load than cycling. A faster heartbeat is the body's heat-dissipation response and cannot be converted into exercise credit.
Q2: How strong is the evidence for heat therapy on blood pressure and vessels?Repeated whole-body heat therapy is associated with systolic-pressure reductions of roughly 2.5–5 mmHg (Pizzey 2021, Price 2025, and parts of Hamaya 2025's analysis), and the vessels' ability to relax and dilate may also improve. But the effect is modest and results vary widely across studies. The reasonable reading: heat therapy may help, with the effect shaped by heating method, frequency and the user's health status.
Q3: If I can't exercise easily, what should I treat heat therapy as?In clinical research its role is an adjunct, or a starting point for substitution discussions: in PAD patients, the heat-therapy group's walking-distance improvement was similar to supervised exercise (Akerman 2019); heart-failure patients improved in function class under medically supervised dry sauna (Tei 2016); older adults using a home lower-body heating device improved blood pressure and vessel-dilation function (Ruiz-Pick 2025). People in these clinical groups should consult a doctor before starting.
Q4: Can whole-body bathing, sauna and foot baths be compared directly?No. The heated body area, water temperature and time jointly determine how much core temperature rises; in general, whole-body immersion has a larger effect than lower-body heating, which is larger than a foot bath. The blood-pressure and vascular evidence comes mainly from whole-body heating, while foot-bath research concentrates on self-perceived sleep quality and comfort.
Q5: What makes a thermostatic foot spa better than a plain basin?What research supports is the execution side: constant temperature, timing and auto power-off make holding a fixed temperature for a fixed time easy (the Durgun and Kaya 2025 trial used a device held at 38–40°C for 20 minutes). As for physiological effect, what was measured was improvement in self-rated sleep and comfort; objective sleep measures were not significant in Shanmugam 2025's pooled analysis.
Q6: Which outcomes does heat therapy currently NOT have evidence for?In current meta-analyses and randomized trials: adding a hot bath after exercise did not further improve cardiorespiratory fitness (Steward 2025); blood sugar, blood lipids, inflammatory markers, arterial stiffness, and instrument-measured sleep outcomes have also shown no clear improvement. It is reasonable to stay skeptical when you see such claims.
Q7: Who should ask a doctor before soaking?People with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, high blood pressure or high blood lipids; pregnant women; older adults; anyone with broken or infected skin; and anyone taking sleep medication, blood-pressure medication or other drugs that affect consciousness or blood pressure. Official guidance is generally 41°C or below — 40°C or below for the three-highs group — and 10–15 minutes per session; details are in the safety section above.
If you want to start at home (brand note)
If, after reading, you want to begin with the lowest-barrier form, a foot bath or half-body bath needs only a basin and hot water. DaFang's Beitou white-sulfur hot-spring powder can add the scent and ritual of a hot-spring soak to that setting — it is a natural bath product, not a medical product. The blood-pressure, vascular and sleep research summarized in this article studied hot water itself and is unrelated to the effects of any bath product.
Further reading
- Is a hot spring better than a hot bath? Heat, water pressure and buoyancy, and what the balneotherapy evidence really shows — this article covers the "heat" layer; that one separates water pressure, buoyancy and minerals into their own layers, a natural next read.
- How Warm Is a 41°C Foot Bath? — if you want to actually start foot bathing, begin with how to set temperature and time.
- What Helps DOMS After Exercise? Heat, Cold, Stretching, and Recovery Myths — for readers who do exercise, the heat-and-cold evidence in the recovery setting.
Sources
- Price BS, et al. (2025). Heat thermotherapy to improve cardiovascular function and cardiometabolic health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental Physiology. https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP092404
- Hamaya R, et al. (2025). Non-acute effects of passive heating interventions on cardiometabolic risk and vascular health: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12490526/
- Pizzey FK, et al. (2021). The effect of heat therapy on blood pressure and peripheral vascular function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental Physiology, 106(6), 1317–1334. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33866630/
- Cullen T, et al. (2020). The health benefits of passive heating and aerobic exercise: To what extent do the mechanisms overlap? Journal of Applied Physiology, 129(6), 1304–1309. https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/japplphysiol.00608.2020
- Akerman AP, et al. (2019). Heat therapy vs. supervised exercise therapy for peripheral arterial disease: a 12-wk randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Physiology–Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 316(6), H1495–H1506. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31002283/
- Rodrigues S, et al. (2025). Passive heat therapy for cardiovascular disease: current evidence and future directions. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 50, 1–14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39819110/
- Ruiz-Pick YI, et al. (2025). Home-based heat therapy lowers blood pressure and improves endothelial function in older adults. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40062687/
- Steward CJ, et al. (2025). Post-exercise hot water immersion enhances haemodynamic and vascular benefits of exercise without further improving cardiorespiratory fitness, glucose, lipids or inflammation. The Journal of Physiology, 603(16), 4515–4533. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40719540/
- Hussain JN, et al. (2022). Infrared sauna as exercise-mimetic? Physiological responses to infrared sauna vs exercise in healthy women: A randomized controlled crossover trial. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 64, 102798. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34954348/
- Shanmugam P, et al. (2025). Does a Hot Foot Bath Improve Sleep Quality? – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40492751/
- Chang SY, et al. (2025). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Footbath Effects and Optimal Procedures to Improve Sleep in Older Adults. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40973991/
- Jiang CS, Chen KM, Belcastro F. (2024). Effects of Temperature, Duration, and Heating Height of Foot Thermal Therapy on Sleep Quality of Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37855919/
- Durgun H, Kaya H. (2025). Effect of Warm Foot Bath on Sleep Quality and Comfort Level of the Elderly: Randomized Controlled Study. Journal of Clinical Practice and Research, 47(2), 173–182. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12478715/
- Tei C, et al. (2016). Waon Therapy for Managing Chronic Heart Failure – Results From a Multicenter Prospective Randomized WAON-CHF Study. Circulation Journal, 80(4), 827–834. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/circj/80/4/80_CJ-16-0051/_article
- Tanaka A. (2026). Effects of Bathtub Bathing and Sauna Practices on Cardiovascular and Systemic Health: A Narrative Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 23(3), 347. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/3/347
- Ukai T, et al. (2020). Habitual tub bathing and risks of incident coronary heart disease and stroke. Heart, 106(10), 732–737. https://heart.bmj.com/content/106/10/732
- Laukkanen T, et al. (2018). Sauna bathing is associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality and improves risk prediction in men and women: a prospective cohort study. BMC Medicine, 16, 219. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-018-1198-0
- World Health Organization. (2020/2024). WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour; Physical activity fact sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity
- 消費者庁 Consumer Affairs Agency, Japan. (2019). 冬季に多発する高齢者の入浴中の事故に御注意ください! https://www.caa.go.jp/policies/policy/consumer_safety/caution/caution_013
- 衛生福利部國民健康署 Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. (2017). 健康泡湯六要項. https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2621-9277-1.html